Challenge the coverage assumption
A generated project draft can mention every requested feature and sound coherent while changing what the team has promised. Challenge the assumption that covering every topic makes the draft ready for approval. Review the obligations created by its sentences, including who must act, what must happen, and which conditions limit the promise.
Find the broken condition
Consider this illustrative request: "The team will launch on Friday if the accessibility check passes." A draft says, "The team will launch on Friday. The accessibility check must pass." If the check fails on Thursday, the request permits delaying launch; the draft still promises Friday. The relationship between "condition" and "conditional" is a useful reminder: a condition governs whether a commitment applies. Keeping the same topics does not keep that relationship. Restore the dependency explicitly before approving the sentence.
Run a practical commitment check
For each promise, write down the responsible party, action, deadline, prerequisite and approval authority. Compare these details with the authorized request. Then ask whether the draft and request allow the same actions when a prerequisite fails. If they differ, revise the wording or obtain an explicit decision from the responsible person. Mark unsupported details as unresolved. A polished sentence does not establish that anyone accepted the obligation. Recheck the revised sentence alongside related commitments so the correction does not create a contradiction.
A new hypothetical boundary case
Suppose the draft promises a Monday demonstration, but the request leaves unclear whether simulated data is acceptable. The demonstration might satisfy one reader and disappoint another even when every stated condition holds. Decision rule: if two plausible interpretations change the deliverable or acceptance decision, keep the commitment unresolved until the project owner chooses one. Otherwise, record the interpretation and continue review. These examples are illustrative, not reported test results. ABOLTUS is in development; this checklist describes manual review without assuming product capabilities.